ImmigrationClockFacts first
Final rule · Federal Register

Weighted Selection Process for Registrants and Petitioners Seeking To File Cap-Subject H-1B Petitions

Recorded by ImmigrationClock from Federal Register, published Dec 29, 2025, effective Feb 27, 2026.

Severity
Changes what someone can or must do
Classification
Final rule
Published
Dec 29, 2025
Effective
Feb 27, 2026
Source checked
Aug 2, 2026
Changes what someone can or must doFinal ruleFederal Register

Weighted Selection Process for Registrants and Petitioners Seeking To File Cap-Subject H-1B Petitions

The U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is amending its regulations governing the process by which U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) selects H-1B registrations for unique beneficiaries for filing of H-1B cap-subject petitions (or H-1B petitions for any year in which the registration requirement is suspended). Through this rule, DHS is implementing a weighted selection process that will generally favor the allocation of H-1B visas to higher-skilled and higher-paid aliens, while maintaining the opportunity for employers to secure H-1B workers at all wage levels, to better serve the congressional intent for the H-1B program. This rule will be effective in time for the FY 2027 registration season.

What this means

  • This rule has been in effect since 2026-02-27. (effectiveAt)
  • The document names H-1B specialty occupation. It may identify others — read the original to be sure. (impact.stated (partial))
  • The document states a requirement for the people it covers. The exact wording is quoted above — whether it applies to any particular person depends on facts this platform does not have. (impact.actionRequired)

Derived from this event’s own recorded fields — not written by a model, and not an interpretation of anyone’s case.

Who is affected

Visa categoriesH-1B specialty occupation

This document sets the rule but leaves the specific list of who it covers to a separate government determination. The list is not in this document, so we do not show one here — check the issuing agency's own published list. …in computer science and engineering in U.S. universities, fields that directly contribute to advances in AI, cybersecurity, biotechnology, and semiconductor design--all areas identified by the Departments of War and Commerce as critical to U.S. national security and economic resilience.

What the document says may be required

The document states a requirement for those it covers. The exact obligation, and whether it applies to a particular person, depends on the document's own terms — the relevant passage is quoted below.

Section 214(c)(1) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1184(c)(1), which, inter alia, authorizes the Secretary to prescribe how an importing employer may petition for nonimmigrant workers, including nonimmigrants described at section 101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(15)(H)(i)(b), as well as the form of the petition and the information that an importing employer must provide in the petition;

This list may be incomplete — the document may identify others. Read the original. Assembled from the source document, not from anyone's individual circumstances. Whether a change applies to a specific person depends on facts this platform does not have. This is data context, not legal advice.

Published Dec 29, 2025Effective Feb 27, 2026Source checked Aug 2, 2026Read the originalMethodologyPermalink

Context

Source-backed explainers of the distinctions this kind of document turns on.

Other recorded changes on the same rule, or naming the same visa, country or Policy Manual section. Newest first.

Follow this

Choose the countries, visas, agencies and topics this change touches, and ImmigrationClock will organise future changes around them — in your browser, never on our servers.

Follow what matters →

Share this record

https://immigrationclock.com/what-changed/weighted-selection-process-for-registrants-and-petitioners-seeking-to-ppud67

Methodology & sources
This record was built from the linked government document by explicit, published rules per source — never by a language model, and never by how much attention an item might attract. Where the document states who is affected, it is quoted; where ImmigrationClock inferred something, it is labelled as an inference. The source was last checked on Aug 2, 2026. Nothing here is legal advice about anyone’s case. Read the full methodology →