ImmigrationClockFacts first

Civil Money Penalty for Actions in Contempt of an Immigration Judge's Proper Exercise of Authority

Proposed ruleProposed Jul 30, 2026

This is a PROPOSED rule. It is not in force, may change before finalisation, and may never be finalised.

Where it stands

  1. Proposed

    Jul 30, 2026

  2. Final rule

    None in our archive

What the document says

This notice of proposed rulemaking ("NPRM") would implement a provision of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA" or "the Act") that authorizes Immigration Judges, under regulations prescribed by the Attorney General, to sanction by civil money penalty any action (or inaction) in contempt of the proper exercise of their authority by certain individuals. The rule would: define the scope of the contempt authority; provide procedures for contempt findings, penalty determinations, and penalty payment; establish an appellate process; and implement oversight of the use of contempt authority. The rule would also make conforming changes to the grounds for practitioner discipline.

Who the document names

The document does not name specific countries or visa categories in its scope language. Read the original to confirm whether it applies to a particular case.

A requirement the document states

“The individual's response will be required to include the following information:”

Whether it applies to a particular person depends on facts this record does not have.

Explained

Want changes like this in one place? Follow the visas, countries and agencies it names.

Immigration Pulse: the 5 biggest changes each week.
Subscribe

About this record

Source
Federal Register, checked Oct 28, 2026
Review
Classified automatically; not reviewed by a person

Built from the linked government document by published rules, not by a language model. Information about a published document, not legal advice about anyone’s case. Methodology · Permalink